Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Fake or Credible? Navigating the News

A guide to responsible news consumption, created and updated by Stevens librarians


Headlines: Headlines accurately represent the substance of articles, with minimally emotional language (recognizing that their purpose is as much marketing as informational).


Don't believe the headline. At the very least, it's incomplete.

Recognize manipulative language. If it's in the form of a question, includes "you won't believe," or "bombshell," skip it. If the headline appeals directly to your concerns or fears, assume it's attempting to con you.

Google the story. If this is the only site reporting it, it's either an "exclusive" (unlikely) or fake. If there are other sites reporting it, use a well-known, generally dependable news source instead.

Read the article critically. If it passes the Publication, Basic Facts, Evidence, and Bias tests, go ahead and share it.





The purpose of headlines is to:

  1. increase clicks and shares for ad revenue
  2. provide information about the story

In short, headlines are primarily an ad for the article. If you only read the headline, that's like only reading an ad and thinking you know how well the product actually works*. (BTW, the author of a news article rarely writes the headline. Headline writers do that. Blame them, not journalists, for misleading headlines.)

*The Chevrolet Vega won awards when it was release in 1970, but body and engine problems plagued it until it was discontinued in 1977, and it is on many lists of worst car of all time.


Many people are sure that stories of concern to them aren't being covered adequately or fairly in the "mainstream" news, and seek out "alternative" sources. It's always a good idea to check multiple sources, and there are certainly instances of big, traditional news outlets not covering a developing story. However, there are many non-political reasons that a news outlet wouldn't cover a story, e.g., they might:

  • take longer on breaking news because there's an editorial and fact-checking process
  • not have the resources to send someone across the country on a risky bet
  • think the story either won't develop into something of national interest, or their readers wouldn't connect with it

If in 24 hours major outlets still aren't covering a story, there is often (but not always!) a good reason. If you must post a dubious story, please frame it with a caution, e.g.: "This looks interesting, but I haven't confirmed it elsewhere."


Guide adapted from News Know-How by Steve Runge at Boston College, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License